$330,000
Est. value of CACI Stock Transactions by US Politicians Over the Past 2 Years.

Sign up to access historical data

Sign up

Trades by US Politicians

Politician Filing Date Type Size
Michael McCaul
Apr 10, 2025Buy$100K - $250K
Gil Cisneros
Apr 8, 2025Sell$15K - $50K
April McClain Delaney
Apr 2, 2025Sell$1K - $15K
Michael McCaul
Mar 6, 2025Buy$100K - $250K
John Delaney
Feb 27, 2025Buy$1K - $15K
John Delaney
Feb 22, 2025Sell$1K - $15K
John Delaney
Feb 18, 2025Sell$1K - $15K
Julie Johnson
Feb 11, 2025Sell$1K - $15K
Gil Cisneros
Jan 31, 2025Buy$15K - $50K

FAQ - Congress Trading

Michael McCaul purchased CACI shares most recently on April 10, 2025.

Michael McCaul has bought the most CACI stock in the last 2 years, with an estimated value of $350,000.

Gil Cisneros has sold the most CACI stock in the last 2 years, with an estimated value of $33,000.

According to our estimates, the net value of trades by US politicians for CACI in the last 2 years is positive, amounting to $330,000. This indicates that US politicians have reasons to believe that the stock is going to go up.

Over the last 2 years, insider transactions for CACI have largely consisted of selling shares, which could suggest various personal or financial motivations among insiders. The higher number of sales might require investors to investigate further, considering politicians might have insights or reasons not immediately apparent to the public.

Monitoring US politicians' stock trades is valuable because they may have inside information about upcoming policies that could affect stock values, providing investors with valuable clues for making informed decisions.

The analytics provided are estimates and not a substitute for professional advice. All investments involve risks, including possible capital loss.

Chat with AltIndex AI

👋 Welcome to AltIndex AI Chat!

Ask about:
  • Top Stocks
  • AI score insights
  • Trending investment opportunities
  • How to use AltIndex
You need to log in to use AltIndex AI Chat.
Disclaimer: AI outputs may be incorrect. This is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional financial advice.