Similar companies
Income Statement (USD)
| Q1 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 142B | 97655.4% |
| Gross Profit | 45.9B | 126480.1% |
| Cost of Revenue | 96.1B | 88061.6% |
| Operating expense | 54.5B | 71992.2% |
| Net Income | -46B | 68085.1% |
| EBITDA | -68.8B | 195746.3% |
Balance Sheet (USD)
| Q1 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 1,274B | 98686.9% |
| Total Liabilities | 1,773B | 101513% |
| Shares Outstanding | 18M | 3% |
Cash Flow (USD)
| Q1 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | -13M | 27% |
| Cash from financing | 5.2M | 55.1% |
EPS
Financial Highlights for FAT Brands in Q1 '25
FAT Brands reported a revenue of 142B, which is a 97655.4% change from the previous quarter. An increase in revenue typically indicates growing demand for the company's products or services. This positive change in revenue is a good sign, suggesting that the company's sales are moving in the right direction.
Gross Profit stood at 45.9B, marking a 126480.1% change since the last quarter. Gross profit showcases the efficiency in production and sales processes.
Cost of Revenue was 96.1B, a 88061.6% difference from the previous quarter. A rising cost of revenue may suggest increased production or sales costs, which can impact margins. However, if accompanied by a proportionate rise in revenue, it could indicate scaling operations.
Operating Expenses for this period were 54.5B, showing a 71992.2% change from the last quarter. Operating expenses cover the costs of running daily business operations. A significant increase might indicate inefficiencies or investments in growth, while a decrease could suggest cost-saving measures or potential underinvestment in key areas.
Net Income for the quarter was -46B, showing a -68085.1% change from the prior quarter. Net income provides a clear picture of the company's profitability after all expenses. An increase suggests the company is becoming more profitable, while a decrease may raise concerns about the company's financial health, unless there are specific one-time costs or investments.
The company's EBITDA for the quarter was -68.8B, showing a -195746.3% change from the previous period. EBITDA gives insight into the company's operational profitability, excluding non-operating expenses like interest and taxes. A rising EBITDA indicates strong operational performance, while a declining EBITDA may signal operational challenges or increased costs.
FAT Brands faced some challenges this quarter with a decline in one or more of the key metrics: revenue, gross profit, or net income. Higher operating expenses might indicate increased investments or potential inefficiencies. A decline in EBITDA signals potential operational challenges or increased costs.
