Similar companies
Income Statement (USD)
| Q3 '24 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 153M | 11.8% |
| Gross Profit | 22M | 181% |
| Cost of Revenue | 131M | 1.4% |
| Operating expense | 8.7M | 26.1% |
| Net Income | 8.7M | 1187.5% |
| EBITDA | 15M | 1360% |
Balance Sheet (USD)
| Q3 '24 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 374M | 5.2% |
| Total Liabilities | 106M | 13.3% |
| Total Equity | 268M | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | 22M | 2.2% |
Cash Flow (USD)
| Q3 '24 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 19M | 58.3% |
| Cash from financing | -2.7M | 75.2% |
EPS
Financial Highlights for Ranger Energy Services in Q3 '24
Ranger Energy Services reported a revenue of 153M, which is a 11.8% change from the previous quarter. An increase in revenue typically indicates growing demand for the company's products or services. This positive change in revenue is a good sign, suggesting that the company's sales are moving in the right direction.
Gross Profit stood at 22M, marking a 181% change since the last quarter. Gross profit showcases the efficiency in production and sales processes.
Cost of Revenue was 131M, a 1.4% difference from the previous quarter. A rising cost of revenue may suggest increased production or sales costs, which can impact margins. However, if accompanied by a proportionate rise in revenue, it could indicate scaling operations.
Operating Expenses for this period were 8.7M, showing a 26.1% change from the last quarter. Operating expenses cover the costs of running daily business operations. A significant increase might indicate inefficiencies or investments in growth, while a decrease could suggest cost-saving measures or potential underinvestment in key areas.
Net Income for the quarter was 8.7M, showing a 1187.5% change from the prior quarter. Net income provides a clear picture of the company's profitability after all expenses. An increase suggests the company is becoming more profitable, while a decrease may raise concerns about the company's financial health, unless there are specific one-time costs or investments.
The company's EBITDA for the quarter was 15M, showing a 1360% change from the previous period. EBITDA gives insight into the company's operational profitability, excluding non-operating expenses like interest and taxes. A rising EBITDA indicates strong operational performance, while a declining EBITDA may signal operational challenges or increased costs.
It was a positive quarter for Ranger Energy Services with growth in revenue, gross profit, and net income. Higher operating expenses might indicate increased investments or potential inefficiencies.
