Similar companies
| Company | Revenue | |
|---|---|---|
 |
Nu SkinNUS |
370M 1.7% |
 |
Estée LauderEL |
4.24B 21.7% |
 |
CotyCOTY |
1.68B 6.4% |
 |
Sally BeautySBH |
943M 0.4% |
Income Statement (USD)
| Q4 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 490M | 42.3% |
| Gross Profit | 347M | 45.5% |
| Cost of Revenue | 142M | 35.1% |
| Operating expense | 280M | 21.1% |
| Net Income | 39M | 1214.3% |
| EBITDA | 88M | 273.4% |
Balance Sheet (USD)
| Q4 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 2.32B | 0.2% |
| Total Liabilities | 1.16B | 1.5% |
| Total Equity | 1.16B | 2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 60M | 1% |
Cash Flow (USD)
| Q4 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 59M | 153.7% |
| Cash from investing | -7.9M | 98.6% |
| Cash from financing | -54M | 109.1% |
EPS
Financial Highlights for e.l.f. Cosmetics in Q4 '25
e.l.f. Cosmetics reported a revenue of 490M, which is a 42.3% change from the previous quarter. An increase in revenue typically indicates growing demand for the company's products or services. This positive change in revenue is a good sign, suggesting that the company's sales are moving in the right direction.
Gross Profit stood at 347M, marking a 45.5% change since the last quarter. Gross profit showcases the efficiency in production and sales processes.
Cost of Revenue was 142M, a 35.1% difference from the previous quarter. A rising cost of revenue may suggest increased production or sales costs, which can impact margins. However, if accompanied by a proportionate rise in revenue, it could indicate scaling operations.
Operating Expenses for this period were 280M, showing a 21.1% change from the last quarter. Operating expenses cover the costs of running daily business operations. A significant increase might indicate inefficiencies or investments in growth, while a decrease could suggest cost-saving measures or potential underinvestment in key areas.
Net Income for the quarter was 39M, showing a 1214.3% change from the prior quarter. Net income provides a clear picture of the company's profitability after all expenses. An increase suggests the company is becoming more profitable, while a decrease may raise concerns about the company's financial health, unless there are specific one-time costs or investments.
The company's EBITDA for the quarter was 88M, showing a 273.4% change from the previous period. EBITDA gives insight into the company's operational profitability, excluding non-operating expenses like interest and taxes. A rising EBITDA indicates strong operational performance, while a declining EBITDA may signal operational challenges or increased costs.
It was a positive quarter for e.l.f. Cosmetics with growth in revenue, gross profit, and net income. Higher operating expenses might indicate increased investments or potential inefficiencies.
