Similar companies
Income Statement (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 701M | 2.2% |
| Gross Profit | 381M | 9.7% |
| Cost of Revenue | 320M | 5.5% |
| Operating expense | 276M | 14.7% |
| Net Income | 82M | 1.6% |
| EBITDA | 126M | 7.1% |
Balance Sheet (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 2.89B | 2.9% |
| Total Liabilities | 907M | 4.3% |
| Total Equity | 1.98B | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | 164M | 0% |
Cash Flow (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 208M | 82.7% |
| Cash from investing | -97M | 121.8% |
| Cash from financing | -59M | 8.2% |
EPS
Financial Highlights for The New York Times in Q3 '25
The New York Times reported a revenue of 701M, which is a 2.2% change from the previous quarter. An increase in revenue typically indicates growing demand for the company's products or services. This positive change in revenue is a good sign, suggesting that the company's sales are moving in the right direction.
Gross Profit stood at 381M, marking a 9.7% change since the last quarter. Gross profit showcases the efficiency in production and sales processes.
Cost of Revenue was 320M, a -5.5% difference from the previous quarter. A rising cost of revenue may suggest increased production or sales costs, which can impact margins. However, if accompanied by a proportionate rise in revenue, it could indicate scaling operations.
Operating Expenses for this period were 276M, showing a 14.7% change from the last quarter. Operating expenses cover the costs of running daily business operations. A significant increase might indicate inefficiencies or investments in growth, while a decrease could suggest cost-saving measures or potential underinvestment in key areas.
Net Income for the quarter was 82M, showing a -1.6% change from the prior quarter. Net income provides a clear picture of the company's profitability after all expenses. An increase suggests the company is becoming more profitable, while a decrease may raise concerns about the company's financial health, unless there are specific one-time costs or investments.
The company's EBITDA for the quarter was 126M, showing a -7.1% change from the previous period. EBITDA gives insight into the company's operational profitability, excluding non-operating expenses like interest and taxes. A rising EBITDA indicates strong operational performance, while a declining EBITDA may signal operational challenges or increased costs.
The New York Times faced some challenges this quarter with a decline in one or more of the key metrics: revenue, gross profit, or net income. Higher operating expenses might indicate increased investments or potential inefficiencies. A decline in EBITDA signals potential operational challenges or increased costs.
